Skip to main content

How did Romeo fall in love with Juliet just seconds after seeing her, and then forget all about Rosaline?

It seems a bit silly, doesn't it? That Romeo and Juliet have hardly known each other for minutes and they believe themselves to be in love? I think the best answer I can give you is that hormones easily make fools of us all.


Romeo and Juliet are the teenage children of two noble Italian families. They have spent their lives in the sort of precious social isolation all noble children were subjected to in order to keep them out of trouble. They have most likely not had a lot of opportunity to meet other people their age, and we already know that Romeo has become infatuated Rosaline. It is very possible that Rosaline was the first pretty ladies (or one of very few) he has ever had the opportunity to spend time with and this has overwhelmed him. Seeing Juliet without Rosaline present for comparison could easily win him over just as well. 


The theme of young love is what makes Romeo and Juliet so relevant even today. Most people have experienced the sort of excitement these two had for each other. Even if it was not a true love or a romantic love, Romeo and Juliet interpreted their intense feelings for one another as love. Both being pubescent and full of hormones like testosterone, estrogen, and oxytocin surely fueled the flame of liking for one another and- combined with a lack of social experience- ultimately lead to their death.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more