Skip to main content

What does Friar John tell Friar Laurence in Romeo and Juliet?

Friar John tells Friar Laurence that Romeo did not get the letter about Juliet. 


After Romeo was banished, Friar Laurence developed a complicated plan to keep Juliet from having to marry Paris. It involved Juliet taking a potion that would make her look dead, resulting in her burial in the Capulet tomb.  The idea was that Romeo would be warned about this by letter. Unfortunately, the letter was waylaid by a plague. Friar Laurence finds out the letter did not get where it was intended when Friar John tells him about the plague.



FRIAR LAURENCE


Who bare my letter, then, to Romeo?


FRIAR JOHN


I could not send it,—here it is again,—
Nor get a messenger to bring it thee,
So fearful were they of infection (Act V, Scene 2).



The plague is very serious. Still, Friar Laurence is not happy that Romeo did not get his letter. He says the letter was of “dear import.” Laurence tells John to get a crowbar and meet him. John agrees, and they part.


By the time Laurence gets to Juliet’s tomb, it is too late.  Romeo already killed Paris and saw Juliet. He assumes she is dead and kills himself with poison he brought with him. Juliet wakes up a little too late, sees Romeo is dead, and kills herself with his dagger.


Naturally, Friar Laurence blames himself for all of this. He explained to the Prince, Montague, and Capulet how Romeo ended up dead next to Juliet, who appeared to have died a second time. Friar Laurence everyone the whole story, including the part about the letter. 



. . . I writ to Romeo,
That he should hither come as this dire night,
To help to take her from her borrow'd grave,
Being the time the potion's force should cease.
But he which bore my letter, Friar John,
Was stay'd by accident, and yesternight
Return'd my letter back (Act V, Scene 3).



Since he had good intentions, Friar Laurence is pardoned.  He was glad that, despite the death of so many young people, the events brought an end to the feud.  That was his goal, and at least he accomplished it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...