Skip to main content

What were the effects the Third Century Crisis on Europe ?

The Third Century Crisis (dated abut 235 to 284 AD) was a time of trouble when many problems converged on the Roman Empire at the same time. Much of the empire’s northern frontier had always been unstable, but in the third century, the northern tribes were especially restless. Food shortages caused by climate change destroyed agriculture while raids from warlike tribesmen destroyed Roman forts and left settlements without protection.


As barbarian tribes grew more powerful, the startled Romans considered building a wall to fend off the invaders who were able to sack and destroy many important cities. Internal squabbles resulted in at least 27 different emperors holding power during the first half of the third century. By 260, it seemed that the empire would be destroyed by ineffective defenses. The western provinces of Gaul (modern France), Britain, and Iberia (Hispania/Spain) formed the Gallic Empire under the leadership of the usurper Postumus, who had protected them from invasion by German barbarians. After Postumus was assassinated by his soldiers in 268, the Gallic Empire lasted only 6 more years before being reabsorbed by the Roman Empire. 


By the time Diocletian seized to power in 284 AD, “constant usurpations and rebellions” plagued the Empire. A usurper was almost always present in Britain throughout the third century, and turmoil continued in Gaul and Spain.  Nevertheless, the legitimate Roman Emperors were able to maintain control of the British province until the Britons “expelled the Roman administration and began to manage their own affairs” in 409 AD. In 410, confronted by the Angles, Saxons, Picts, and Scotts, the Britons asked for help from then Roman Emperor Honorius. His refusal ended the era of Roman Britain. The Franks had complete control of Gaul (France) in 486, and Roman control of Iberia (Spain) was ceded to Persia in 363. The Iberians gained some autonomy from Persia by 406. By 476 AD the Western Roman Empire was defunct. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more