Skip to main content

In Sophocles's view, what role do the gods play in man's destiny? I am also supposed to reference the chorus and their view on the order of the...

Most would argue that Sophocles views the gods as in complete control of a man’s destiny. The prophecy from the gods drives the entire play. While characters spend their lives trying to defy it or prove it wrong, every one of their actions actually perpetuates the prophecy; it is impossible to escape. Even so, Oedipus believes he can escape it and take matters into his own hands. When he first learns the curse on Thebes is related to Laius’s murder, he takes it upon himself to solve Thebes's problems rather than seek the help of the gods. Later, when he starts to learn more information about his past, his pride swells and he refuses to accept that he might be headed for demise. He says “I am the child of luck; I cannot be dishonored. . . How could I not be glad to know by birth?” Though Jocasta warns him to stop searching for information, his desire to know his past blinds him. Still, this knowledge does not change the fate that the gods have in store for him. Whether he knows his origins or not, his fate will be the same. In his mind, though, the information he finds will please him and will show the error in the gods’ prophecy.


The chorus is aware of the danger of Oedipus’s desire to prove the prophecy wrong, and where Oedipus seems to disregard their power (aside from asking them about the curse), the Chorus seeks their assistance and recognizes their power. They warn of what will happen if Oedipus continues on his path to defy the prophecy:



The tyrant is the child of pride
Who drinks from his great sickening cup
Recklessness and vanity,
Until from his high crest headlong
He plummets to the dust of hope



Essentially, the chorus here predicts the tragic downfall of Oedipus, who is brought to ruin by his pride.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more