Skip to main content

In One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, why is Bromden concerned about others finding out that he is not really deaf and mute? What happens that might...

Bromden is a character for whom silence acts as a sort of power within One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. While he has lived on the ward silently for a great period of time and cannot make deep connections with its residents, he nevertheless experiences a form of personal power in the ability to remain relatively unnoticed by staff. As such, he overhears their conversations and meetings and is privy to information he might otherwise not have. Yet, when McMurphy proposes a fishing trip within the novel, Bromden feels a sense of deep inner conflict. He wants to put his name on the sign-up sheet for the boating trip, but realizes that doing so will signal to both patients and staff that his deafness/muteness is not genuine. Kesey writes of Bromden's inner-debate:

"I didn't have the money, but I kept getting this notion that I wanted to sign the list. And the more [McMurphy] talked about fishing for Chinook salmon the more I wanted to go. I knew it was a fool thing to want; if I signed up, it'd be the same as coming right out and telling everybody I wasn't deaf" (Kesey 118). 

A major conflict, for Bromden, lies in his desire to form connections to other people and his desire to retain some sense of agency on the ward. While signing up for the trip means the loss of one “freedom” (his ability to go unnoticed), it gives him another (meaningful experiences outside the ward). The complication of this definition of freedom, as you might conclude, is that it proposes a sort of power lies in being unnoticed and/or unheard, which, for a character whose childhood experiences of being unheard were profoundly damaging, is troublesome.

Kesey, Ken. One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. New York: Signet Books, 1962. PDF file.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more