Skip to main content

In One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, why is Bromden concerned about others finding out that he is not really deaf and mute? What happens that might...

Bromden is a character for whom silence acts as a sort of power within One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. While he has lived on the ward silently for a great period of time and cannot make deep connections with its residents, he nevertheless experiences a form of personal power in the ability to remain relatively unnoticed by staff. As such, he overhears their conversations and meetings and is privy to information he might otherwise not have. Yet, when McMurphy proposes a fishing trip within the novel, Bromden feels a sense of deep inner conflict. He wants to put his name on the sign-up sheet for the boating trip, but realizes that doing so will signal to both patients and staff that his deafness/muteness is not genuine. Kesey writes of Bromden's inner-debate:

"I didn't have the money, but I kept getting this notion that I wanted to sign the list. And the more [McMurphy] talked about fishing for Chinook salmon the more I wanted to go. I knew it was a fool thing to want; if I signed up, it'd be the same as coming right out and telling everybody I wasn't deaf" (Kesey 118). 

A major conflict, for Bromden, lies in his desire to form connections to other people and his desire to retain some sense of agency on the ward. While signing up for the trip means the loss of one “freedom” (his ability to go unnoticed), it gives him another (meaningful experiences outside the ward). The complication of this definition of freedom, as you might conclude, is that it proposes a sort of power lies in being unnoticed and/or unheard, which, for a character whose childhood experiences of being unheard were profoundly damaging, is troublesome.

Kesey, Ken. One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. New York: Signet Books, 1962. PDF file.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more