Skip to main content

What limits our understanding of the Holocaust?

I imagine that are many reasons that people cannot understand the horror of what happened in World War II and actually, previous to World War II.  But a few ideas do come to mind immediately.  First, while other genocides have occurred subsequent to the Holocaust, none has been on the scale that the Holocaust was, and I honestly think we cannot wrap our minds around the enormity of it, the fact that millions of people were systematically put to death largely on the basis of religion or ethnicity.  Second, we all think of ourselves as good people, and we find it hard to understand how ordinary people, presumptively good people, could allow such atrocities to happen, a lack of insight into those people in those times and places.


Just looking at the number of Jews killed, we find our minds reeling, six million Jews just gone.  In Rwanda, 800,000 Tutsis were put to death, and even in Cambodia, which stands out amongst genocides, the number is about two million.  If you have ever been to New York City, you might be able to imagine three-fourths of it wiped out.  But that is still difficult for any of us to conceptualize.  Hitler ultimately approached all of this in an exercise in efficiency, experimenting with means of killing that would not cost him overly much and that could be done quickly.  This scale and approach of man's inhumanity to man should be difficult for us to understand.  I would be quite concerned about anyone who said, "Sure. I can see how that could happen." 


Similarly, we do not want to be people who have mindsets that allow us to visualize being part of a situation like this, either actively helping to slaughter a people or simply standing by saying nothing.  No one wants to think him or herself capable of this. It is like a defense mechanism we all have, that keeps us our consciences clean.  We tell ourselves we wouldn't let this happen.  Sadly, this is not true. We are all capable of allowing this to happen.  One famous study showed that ordinary and decent people were perfectly capable of shocking another person, even to a life-endangering point if ordered to do so in an authoritative way.  This was the Milgram study.  We are all quite capable of this. That is, in fact, the point of Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery."  The towns around the concentration camps smelled people burning.  They saw people crowding the rail cars, going in but never coming back out.  But denial is a powerful force, and as long as we can tell ourselves we simply cannot understand this, we believe it can't happen here.


Unfortunately, our refusal to understand could doom us to other holocausts.  The situation that led to the slaughter of Jews and Gypsies and many other groups was a situation in which things were not going well in the economy and stirring up the populace to blame the problems on some "other" yielded Hitler, the Nazis, and the Holocaust, even aside from all the others who died in World War II.  There are parallels today, in Europe and the United States, and history should not go unheeded.  Not understanding is something we cannot afford. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...
Post a Comment
Read more