Skip to main content

How do I write a thesis statement for "Dog's Death" by John Updike? Do you have suggestions for writing a literary analysis of the piece, too?

Updike's 1958 poem on the subject of a puppy's death is filled with pathos without lapsing into obvious sentimentality or a maudlin tone.


A good way to approach an analysis of this poem is to consider Updike's techniques. Look at how he arranges the stanzas and count the lines in each. Analyze the rhyme scheme; is it regular or irregular? Once you've determined that, think about why that might be appropriate to the subject.


What words are repeated? Why would they be?


What is the speaker's tone, and what words contribute to creating the tone?


How does imagery function in the poem? Are any of the images symbolic?


Remember that modern poems are often meant to observe; what might Updike be observing about the role that pets play in our lives?  What attributes are ascribed particularly to dogs, and how is that at work in the poem? How does the puppy's young age (i.e. not yet housebroken) add to the pathos?


Here are some literary terms that you should consider in writing an analysis of this particular poem: theme, consonance, end rhyme, slant rhyme, symbolism, imagery, quatrain, repetition, and tone.


When writing a thesis statement for a literary analysis, it is a good idea to write a closed thesis to limit the scope of what you will analyze. Acknowledging the theme in the thesis is also recommended. Here is an example:


Updike utilizes symbolism, imagery, and varying rhyme schemes to examine the relationship between people and pets and the emotions evoked by the unexpected death of a family dog.


Note that the thesis statement identifies a theme and three particular techniques that could be the focus of the essay's development.


Good luck with your analysis!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.