Skip to main content

How is Holden Caulfield being a hypocrite to the adults in The Catcher in the Rye? Who are the adults that he is hypocritical to?

Holden Caulfield is an interesting character in that his own actions do not reflect his beliefs about how others should act and who they should be. Throughout the book, he expresses the idea that a person should be exactly who they present themselves as; if they turn out to be somewhat different than they appear to be, he refers to them as "phony." This is fascinating because in the book we see that Holden is very dishonest when interacting and speaking with others; he often pretends to be someone that the reader knows he is not. He is critical of the people that he meets, yet he is lonely and in need of companionship. He wants to be able to know who a stranger is, and yet he lies to them constantly about who he is. When he escapes his prep school to journey into the city of New York, he is shocked at how people's behavior does not live up to his expectations. 


Mr. Haas, Holden's headmaster at the school, is frequently described as one of these "phonies." He shakes hands and smiles at the parents who drop their children off, but to Holden, his obvious judgment of others is very disingenuous. However, he lies to Ernest Marrow's mother on the train ride to New York about what his name is and the details of his life. His older brother, D.B., is working in the movie industry, which Holden also finds disgusting, and so he likewise judges his brother for being associated with it. When he finally goes out to The Lavender Room and tries to make some friends in three women that he meets there, he even says, "You could hardly tell which was the stupidest of the three of them" (63). These actions on the part of Holden demonstrate how his hypocrisy has kept him from banishing his loneliness, because he just keeps isolating himself and alienating others. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...