Skip to main content

How is Holden Caulfield being a hypocrite to the adults in The Catcher in the Rye? Who are the adults that he is hypocritical to?

Holden Caulfield is an interesting character in that his own actions do not reflect his beliefs about how others should act and who they should be. Throughout the book, he expresses the idea that a person should be exactly who they present themselves as; if they turn out to be somewhat different than they appear to be, he refers to them as "phony." This is fascinating because in the book we see that Holden is very dishonest when interacting and speaking with others; he often pretends to be someone that the reader knows he is not. He is critical of the people that he meets, yet he is lonely and in need of companionship. He wants to be able to know who a stranger is, and yet he lies to them constantly about who he is. When he escapes his prep school to journey into the city of New York, he is shocked at how people's behavior does not live up to his expectations. 


Mr. Haas, Holden's headmaster at the school, is frequently described as one of these "phonies." He shakes hands and smiles at the parents who drop their children off, but to Holden, his obvious judgment of others is very disingenuous. However, he lies to Ernest Marrow's mother on the train ride to New York about what his name is and the details of his life. His older brother, D.B., is working in the movie industry, which Holden also finds disgusting, and so he likewise judges his brother for being associated with it. When he finally goes out to The Lavender Room and tries to make some friends in three women that he meets there, he even says, "You could hardly tell which was the stupidest of the three of them" (63). These actions on the part of Holden demonstrate how his hypocrisy has kept him from banishing his loneliness, because he just keeps isolating himself and alienating others. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.