Skip to main content

In "A Jury of Her Peers," where is Minnie Wright during the story's events?

During Glaspell's classic short story "A Jury of Her Peers," Minnie Wright does not appear in her own house. Instead, she is absent. To be specific, she's in jail. This is indicated in passing, through conversation.


When Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters are talking about what happened, and why they are there, the subject of Mrs. Wright wanting them to bring her apron to her comes up. Mrs. Peters says, "…there's not much to get you dirty in jail, goodness knows." This indicates Mrs. Wright is in jail, and that she's likely to stay there for long enough to need things from home. Just as Mrs. Wright's place in her home played a role in the crime, her place in the jail plays a role in how the women make sense of things.


The only other places Minnie Wright appears in the story are in the dialogue among the characters (mainly Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters), and in their memories.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.