Skip to main content

Why did the weavers like Silas Marner develop eccentric habits in the novel Silas Marner?

Before the Industrial Revolution, being a weaver was a solitary and isolated occupation. Furthermore, without human contact, people often develop odd ways to compensate for their loss of socialization.


In the time of the setting of Eliot's novel, also, people were anything but peripatetic; instead, they stayed close to where their parents lived.



To the peasants of old times, the world outside their own direct experience was a region of vagueness and mystery. . . a settler, if he came from distant parts, hardly ever ceased to be viewed with a remnant of distrust (Chapter 1).



Weavers were sometimes not considered members of the community. At any rate, they often lived outside a village and among superstitious people, and the "questionable sound of the loom" held a "half-fearful fascination" for boys of the village, who would peep into the window of the weaver and taunt him (Chapter 1).


Because of the repetitious nature of this indoor occupation, the weaver seemed odd compared to those who lived an agrarian life. His life reduced itself to "the mere function of weaving" (Chapter 1), and he appeared pale and strange in comparison to the men who worked outdoors.


Knowing, then, that they were viewed with some suspicion, weavers may have tended to become more introverted, talking little to those to whom they made deliveries of their linen and being mistrustful of other people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.