Skip to main content

If the cell membrane were removed from the cell, could it still survive?

The short answer is No.


The cell membrane in cells is an essential part of the cell. It separates the inside and the outside of the cell. In a way, the cell membrane defines the region that actually is the cell. It is made up of molecules called phospholipids that come together a structure called the lipid bilayer. The nature of this bilayer allows it to be selectively permeable. Moreover, various proteins are anchored in this cellular membrane, proteins that are also essential for the life of the cell. Hence, it serves as a platform for proteins and other biomolecules, and a sort of selectivity filter for what comes in and out of the cell. 


The importance of the cell membrane is hence, paramount to the survival of the cell. It maintains homeostasis, or internal balance, and also maintains the shape and structure of the cell.


By getting rid of the cell membrane, not only is the internal balance and equilibrium of the cell broken, the entire structure and shape of the cell disappears, and the cell dies.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more