Skip to main content

Why was the poet puzzled to hear the little girl's answer?

The narrator in "We Are Seven" gets into a good-natured argument with the little maid he meets. The narrator asks the eight-year-old how many brothers and sisters she has, and she tells him, "We are seven." She goes on to explain that two of her siblings have "gone to sea," and two live in another town. Two more have died and are buried in the churchyard close to where the girl lives with her mother. The narrator then repeats what the girl has told him and tries to clarify that, in that case, she has only four siblings, or five children in her family. The girl relates that she knits her stockings and eats by the graves of her dead brother and sister. She sings to them and sits with them. To her, they are still her siblings--as much as the ones who have gone to sea or live away from home.


The narrator is puzzled that she counts the dead siblings as her siblings still. He tries to explain the difference between those who live on this earth and those who are no longer present here but are in Heaven. He tells her, "You run about, my little Maid, / Your limbs they are alive." In the first stanza, a short prologue implies that the child is too sweet and innocent to understand death. But by giving the little girl the last word, "Nay, we are seven," the poet may be suggesting that the girl knows more about what it means to have brothers and sisters and be part of a family than the narrator does.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.