Skip to main content

Why do the ion tail and dust tail of a comet point in different directions?

The ion tail and the dust tail of a comet point in different directions because they are reacting to different forces. The ion tail (also called the plasma tail) occurs from from a reaction of the ion `` from the comet with the magnetic field found in solar wind. This causes the ion tail to point directly away from the sun. Fluctuations in the magnetic field can cause twists, "knots" and other variations in the appearance of the ion tail.


The dust tail of a comet is impacted by the force of radiation from the sun (called radiation pressure). Even thought the dust tail is formed by particles dislodged by the radiation pressure from the sun, the path of the dust tail is dictated by the movement of the comet. The direction of the dust tail points away from the sun but also behind comet, where the comet has traveled. This results in the dust trail having a curve that follows the comet on its orbit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.