Skip to main content

If you were a congressman in 1819, how would you have solved the issue of Missouri’s application for statehood?

I believe that the Missouri Compromise was a rather brilliant idea given the circumstances at the time, so I hope I would have solved the issue of Missouri’s statehood just the way Congress did at the time.  Let us look at the other choices and why they are less attractive.


First, Congress could have rejected Missouri’s application and made it continue as a territory.  I do not think this would be a good solution because it would deny the people of Missouri their rights as Americans.  It would, for example, have denied them representation in Congress and a vote in the Electoral College.  It is not right for Americans to be without these things.


Second, Congress could have either voted Missouri in as a slave state or a free state without doing anything else.  This might seem more moral.  It was definitely morally wrong to have slaves and it would have been more moral to prohibit slavery in the new state.  The problem is that this could have destroyed the United States.  It could have made the South split away from the North over this issue.  That would have been a bad result.


I think that the Missouri Compromise was the best possible compromise at the time.  It allowed the slave and free states to continue to have equal numbers in the Senate.  It drew a line that determined which territories would become free states and which would become slave states.  This made sure there would not be any more conflict over the issue of slavery in the Louisiana Purchase.  Because it was a good deal, it lasted until the Mexican-American War caused problems by increasing the territory of the US.


So, what this question comes down to is whether you think you would have voted to keep the Union together or to try to end slavery.  Do you think it would have been better for the US to split apart with the North being free and the South slave?  Or do you think it was better to compromise in order to keep the Union together?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...
Post a Comment
Read more