Skip to main content

Who are some character foils in Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing, and what is their effect on the story?

Foils are characters that contrast with one another so that the author can highlight important details or traits of each person. In Much Ado About Nothing, Shakespeare implements many different types of foils. He even uses groups of characters as foils for one another. I will give you a few examples--but there are many more.


First and most importantly, our two main couples, Beatrice and Benedick and Hero and Claudio, are foils for each other. We can see this starting in the first act. Beatrice and Benedick engage in witty and argumentative repartee and seem to completely hate each other. In contrast, at the beginning of the story Hero and Claudio are obviously in love, and they act kindly toward one another. In Act IV, when the wedding is broken up by Don John's lie, the two couples contrast yet again as Benedick and Beatrice unite and Claudio and Hero are torn apart by the horrible accusation that Hero has been unfaithful.


Another important pair of foils in the story is Don Pedro and Don John. These two men exemplify a more classic version of the foil. One is good and one is bad. From the beginning of the story it is made clear that Don John is bad news. In Act 1 Scene 3 he is seen conspiring against his brother with his henchmen because he would much rather be known as "a canker in a hedge than a rose in his [brother's] grace." It is also made clear in this scene that Don John was already granted mercy by his brother Don Pedro for previous wrongdoing. It is clear that one of these men is honorable and good and the other is not.


There are numerous other foils in this story and I encourage you to look for them! Think about characters whose ideas, personalities, and actions contrast drastically.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more