Skip to main content

How does Miss Brill deal with reality in the short story by Katherine Mansfield?

Miss Brill doesn't really "deal with" reality—at least, not until the very end of the story. Initially, she imagines that her little fox fur is alive, even referring to it as a "Little rogue," as though it has not only living but also had a sassy, saucy personality as well. Then, when she arrives at the park, Miss Brill begins to imagine that she's playing a role in a play—that everyone in the park has such a role—and she seems not to understand that she is, like almost everyone else there, old and decrepit. It's as though she actively ignores reality, preferring her fantasy instead. She still sees herself as vital, vibrant, and important until she hears the harsh and unkind words of the young couple who sit down next to her.  The boy calls her "silly" and "stupid," and the girl makes fun of her fur. 


We know this has affected Miss Brill on some level because she skips her usual stop at the bakery, forgoing her piece of cake, and she begins to cry as she puts her fur away in the box (though she doesn't seem to realize it is she who is crying and not the fox). Reality seems to be breaking in to her consciousness, as Miss Brill would not cry if she was still living in her cheerful fantasy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.