Skip to main content

How does a single bank create money under the fractional reserve system?

A single bank creates money under the fractional reserve system by lending out more money than it takes in in deposits.  This is one reason why banks are so important in our system.


When a person deposits money in the bank, that money does not simply sit there.  Instead, the bank loans it out.  The bank is not allowed to loan all of the money out.  It has to keep some fraction of the money in what is called reserves, thus the term “fractional reserve” banking.  When it loans that money out, it creates money that had not existed before.


Imagine that you deposit $1000 in the bank.  Let us say that the bank is required to keep 10% of that money in reserves.  It then lends me $900.  It has created $900 that had not previously existed.  You still have the right to $1000, but I also have $900 in money that the bank just created.  Now imagine that I deposit the $900 that I borrowed in my account.  The bank would have to keep $90 of it (10%) in reserve, but it could still loan out the other $810.  Now, the bank has created $1710 that did not exist before.  This could go on and on, with the amount that the bank creates getting larger and larger.  This is how a single bank can create money under the fractional reserve system.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more