Skip to main content

In the story "Chickamauga" by Ambrose Bierce, what is ironic about what frightens the boy?

There are two definite occurrences in which Ambrose Bierce uses situational irony in his short story, "Chickamauga." 


Situational irony is defined as a literary device in which what is expected to happen is the opposite of what actually happens. 


In this story, the little boy is first frightened by a rabbit.



 "Advancing from the bank of the creek he suddenly found himself confronted with a new and more formidable enemy: in the path that he was following, sat, bolt upright, with ears erect and paws suspended before it, a rabbit! With a startled cry the child turned and fled, he knew not in what direction, calling with inarticulate cries for his mother, weeping, stumbling, his tender skin cruelly torn by brambles, his little heart beating hard with terror--breathless, blind with tears--lost in the forest!"



It is ironic that something as harmless as a rabbit, which is an animal of prey and not a predator, frightens the little boy to the point that he runs so far as to become lost in the forest.  


The second instance of situational irony occurs when the boy encounters the soldiers returning from a battle. It is ironic that he is not frightened of these bloodied men at all. The men are crawling on their hands and knees, and many are maimed. The little boy interprets their bloody wounds as the paint he has seen clowns wear. He interprets their crawling as a game and attempts to ride on of the soldiers like he rides his father's "negroes" at his home.  



 "He now approached one of these crawling figures from behind and with an agile movement mounted it astride. The man sank upon his breast, recovered, flung the small boy fiercely to the ground as an unbroken colt might have done, then turned upon him a face that lacked a lower jaw--from the upper teeth to the throat was a great red gap fringed with hanging shreds of flesh and splinters of bone. The unnatural prominence of nose, the absence of chin, the fierce eyes, gave this man the appearance of a great bird of prey crimsoned in throat and breast by the blood of its quarry. The man rose to his knees, the child to his feet. The man shook his fist at the child; the child, terrified at last, ran to a tree near by, got upon the farther side of it and took a more serious view of the situation."



The boy has no framework for understanding the appearance of the man without a jaw. He can see the fury in his eyes, but it is only when he shakes his fist at him that the boy becomes truly terrified. It is ironic that the entire entourage of hundreds of wounded soldiers did not phase him, but the anger of this one terrifies him. 


There is another incidence of irony at the end of the story when the author reveals that the child is a deaf mute. This explains why he hasn't heard the sounds of battle, and therefore hasn't interpreted it as such. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.